•  BIS study questions liquidity decentralization in DEXs like Uniswap v3, revealing concentration issues.

• Web3’s promise of democratization is undermined by DeFi liquidity concentration among few pools.

• 250 pools control 80% of total value locked (TVL), raising fairness concerns in DeFi.

The world of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has long been hailed as a revolutionary force, promising a democratization of financial services by removing traditional intermediaries.

However, a recent study by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) reveals that DeFi liquidity concentration remains alarmingly high on leading DEXs like Uniswap v3, raising compelling questions concerning the authenticity of their “decentralized nature.”

While DeFi is seen as a more open and inclusive alternative to traditional finance, the BIS report doubts whether this vision is fully realized.

How DeFi liquidity concentration Manifests on DEXs

What drives what is liquidity concentration in DEX?

The BIS study offers an eye-opening glimpse into the liquidity dynamics of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap.

While technically decentralized platforms, such as DEXs, remain technically decentralized, their study revealed that their liquidity provision is concentrated among only 250 liquidity pools – approximately 80% of TVL is controlled by just 250.

This unprecedented adoption generally hints at a controversy towards its core principle.

For those in the dark, liquidity concentration in DEX refers to the skewed distribution of liquidity provisions, where a small number of liquidity pools or providers control the majority of trading volume and value locked in decentralized exchanges.

This very notion undermines DeFi’s core principle of the democratization of finances. This has been a growing concern for some time; for instance, as per DeFiLlama data (July 2024), DEXs handle around $6 billion in daily volume and $45 billion weekly.

However, Uniswap v3 alone boasts $2.5 billion in liquidity—surpassing some centralized venues like KuCoin’s $2.1 billion.

CHECK OUT: Why Bitcoin’s $100K Milestone May Disrupt Africa’s Financial Ecosystem

Several factors often drive this DeFi liquidity concentration:

• High capital requirements: Significant collateral and impermanent loss risk deter retail participants.
• Institutional advantages: Deep pockets, sophisticated risk tools, and professional market-making outfits.
• Protocol design: Features like concentrated liquidity improve capital efficiency but demand technical know-how, tilting benefits toward larger LPs.
• Liquidity fragmentation: Assets dispersed across chains and DEXs create silos, reinforcing major pools’ dominance.

Analyzing institutional vs retail LP returns

An important takeaway from the study was its findings on significant liquidity provider disparities where institutional vs. retail LP returns underscored a yawning yield gap.

According to BIS findings, retail LPs participating in decentralized exchanges earn significantly lower returns than their institutional counterparts, often leading to greater risk-adjusted losses.

Most of the time, retail liquidity provider returns in DeFi significantly depend on the concentration.

The BIS report highlights the concentration of liquidity provision in DeFi platforms, where a small number of institutional players control the majority of liquidity, which raises concerns about the true decentralization of these platforms.[Photo: Medium]

Meanwhile, institutional LPs leverage technical expertise and economies of scale to dominate high-yield pools, leveraging on “custom price ranges and dynamic hedging.”

This generally showcases the DeFi liquidity risks for retail investors, showcasing how institutional vs retail LP returns are one-sided.

The Case for DeFi’s Promise in Africa: A Counterpoint

As DeFi adoption grows in Africa, these findings are relevant to the continent’s burgeoning Web3 community. The promise of decentralization has been especially appealing in Africa, where many regions grapple with limited access to banking and traditional financial services.

In this context, it offers a chance to leapfrog traditional financial systems and provide more inclusive access to capital.

However, the BIS study suggests that if a small number of institutional players dominate liquidity provision, the foundations of decentralization could be undermined.

The liquidity concentration on DeFi undermines decentralization, rewriting the story many African economies face today but with a different medium.

Defi liquidity risks for retail investors are the least of their worries as it would further exacerbate existing inequalities, preventing broadening liquidity provider disparities.

Although the BIS report presents an upbeat assessment of DeFi’s decentralization, economist Gordon Liao provides another viewpoint. Liao suggests that the institutional vs. retail LP returns within blockchain may not differ as much as suggested.

Web3 is still providing retail investors with promising opportunities in Africa. Many African regions experience limited banking access, slow processing speeds, limited access to various services, and many more.

Can DeFi Truly Democratize Finance?

The report raises important questions about DeFi’s democratizing potential.

The Crypto Liquidity Centralization Explained by BIS findings pokes a hole into the entire DeFI franchise, suggesting that simply enabling participation is insufficient to ensure true decentralization or financial democratization.

Economic forces may naturally lead to the concentration of power, even in decentralized platforms like Uniswap.

For Africa to realize a truly decentralized liquidity market, platforms could explore solutions like:

• Decentralized Staking Pools: Enable small investors to pool resources and compete with institutions.
• Improved Governance Models: Prioritize retail-friendly policies on DEX platforms.
• Financial Literacy Initiatives: Educate users on mitigating risks like impermanent loss.
• Layer 2 integration to slash transaction costs and latency.
• DeFi insurance products to underwrite impermanent loss.
• Tokenization of real-world assets to diversify capital sources.

Mitigating DeFi liquidity concentration

The BIS findings on DeFi liquidity concentration provide a nuanced picture of the dangers of centralization within web3. It’s a wake-up call to show us that decentralization is more than code and governance.

It adds that by bridging the yield gap—between institutional vs retail LP returns and bolstering retail liquidity provider returns in DeFi, we can rewire this trillion-dollar market to its former glory of democratizing finance.

As DeFi evolves, addressing these disparities isn’t just ethical; it’s essential for sustaining the ecosystem’s growth and relevance.